This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Nitrate labelled with 15 N was added for 2 years to a small Boreal Shield forested catchment to evaluate where new nitrogen (N) inputs are stored in this system in the short term. The landscape in the study catchment is a mosaic of Pinus banksiana Lamb. - Picea mariana (Mill.) BSP "forest islands" surrounded by "pillows" of lichens, mosses, and grasses on exposed bedrock surfaces. After the second year of N addition, 10% of the added 15 N was found in aboveground biomass, 27% in organic horizons, 6% in forest island mineral soil, 3% in "soil" underneath pillows, and 16% was lost through runoff. Despite covering a smaller proportion of the catchment and having only slightly larger N stocks, forest islands stored more 15 N (31%) than pillows (15%). Preferential routing of water towards forest islands and a greater potential for biotic and abiotic N immobilization are hypothesized to favor N retention in forest islands. Thirty-eight percent of the 15 N could not be accounted for. The comparison of a mass-balance analysis with the 15 N recovery suggests a missing sink for the 15 N in forest islands, possibly woody detritus. In the short term (~2 years), organic horizons are the main sinks for elevated N inputs in the boreal forest.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lamontagne et al. (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: