PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 14, 2023International Journal of Cancer63 citationsOpen Access

Circulating white blood cell traits and colorectal cancer risk: A Mendelian randomisation study

View Full Paper
ACAndrei‐Emil ConstantinescuCBCaroline J. BullNJNicholas Jones

Key Result

Genetically predicted higher eosinophil count was associated with a reduced risk of colorectal cancer (OR per 1-SD increase 0.93; 95% CI 0.88-0.98; P=0.01).

Study Design

Type

Observational (n=550,000)

Structured PICO

Do increased circulating white blood cell counts reduce the risk of colorectal cancer?

P
Population
Individuals from GWAS datasets (N = ~550,000 for WBC traits, 52,775 CRC cases and 45,940 controls) and UK Biobank cohort (4,043 incident CRC cases and 332,773 controls)
I
Intervention
Increased circulating white blood cell counts (basophils, eosinophils, monocytes, lymphocytes, neutrophils)
C
Comparator
Lower circulating white blood cell counts
O
Outcome
Colorectal cancer (CRC) riskhard clinical

Genetically predicted and observationally measured increases in eosinophil and lymphocyte counts are associated with a reduced risk of colorectal cancer.

Main Result

Effect estimate: OR 0.93 (95% CI 0.88-0.98)

p-value: p=.01

Abstract

Observational studies have suggested a protective role for eosinophils in colorectal cancer (CRC) development and implicated neutrophils, but the causal relationships remain unclear. Here, we aimed to estimate the causal effect of circulating white blood cell (WBC) counts (N = ~550 000) for basophils, eosinophils, monocytes, lymphocytes and neutrophils on CRC risk (N = 52 775 cases and 45 940 controls) using Mendelian randomisation (MR). For comparison, we also examined this relationship using individual-level data from UK Biobank (4043 incident CRC cases and 332 773 controls) in a longitudinal cohort analysis. The inverse-variance weighted (IVW) MR analysis suggested a protective effect of increased basophil count and eosinophil count on CRC risk OR per 1-SD increase: 0.88, 95% CI: 0.78-0.99, P = .04; OR: 0.93, 95% CI: 0.88-0.98, P = .01. The protective effect of eosinophils remained OR per 1-SD increase: 0.88, 95% CI: 0.80-0.97, P = .01 following adjustments for all other WBC subtypes, to account for genetic correlation between the traits, using multivariable MR. A protective effect of increased lymphocyte count on CRC risk was also found OR: 0.84, 95% CI: 0.76-0.93, P = 6.70e-4 following adjustment. Consistent with MR results, a protective effect for eosinophils in the cohort analysis in the fully adjusted model RR per 1-SD increase: 0.96, 95% CI: 0.93-0.99, P = .02 and following adjustment for the other WBC subtypes RR: 0.96, 95% CI: 0.93-0.99, P = .001 was observed. Our study implicates peripheral blood immune cells, in particular eosinophils and lymphocytes, in CRC development, highlighting a need for mechanistic studies to interrogate these relationships.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Constantinescu et al. (2023) conducted an observational in Colorectal cancer (n=550,000). Circulating white blood cell counts (eosinophils, basophils, lymphocytes) was evaluated on Colorectal cancer risk (OR 0.93, 95% CI 0.88-0.98, p=.01). Genetically predicted higher eosinophil count was associated with a reduced risk of colorectal cancer (OR per 1-SD increase 0.93; 95% CI 0.88-0.98; P=0.01).

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a19e48a4b45427442eadec0https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.34691
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper