Key result
A 24-item survey measuring patient perceptions of participation in bedside handover was developed and validated, demonstrating a three-factor structure with strong reliability and validity.
Why the study?
Valid and reliable tools were needed to measure patient perceptions of participation in bedside handover to consistently and effectively evaluate implementation and improvement efforts.
Cross-Sectional (n=326)
A valid and reliable 24-item survey was developed to measure patient perceptions of participation in bedside handover, facilitating evaluation of this care approach.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports evaluation of patient participation in handovers; leaves open effects on clinical outcomes.
INTRODUCTION: When handover is conducted at the patient's bedside, active patient participation can be encouraged, which may improve the safety and quality of care. There is a need for valid and reliable tools to measure patient perceptions of participation in bedside handover, to ensure the rising number of implementation and improvement efforts are consistently and effectively evaluated. The aim of this study is to systematically develop and evaluate the psychometric properties of a self-report survey to measure patients' perceptions of participation in bedside handover. METHODS: In Phase 1, our team developed a conceptual framework and item pool (n = 130). In Phase 2, content validity was assessed with four health consumers, four nurses and four researchers. Next, 10 current hospital inpatients tested the survey for end-user satisfaction. In Phase 3, 326 inpatients completed the survey, allowing exploratory factor analysis, reliability analyses and convergent/divergent validity analyses to occur. RESULTS: Phase 1 and 2 resulted in a 42-item survey. In Phase 3, 321 surveys were available for analysis. Exploratory factor analysis revealed a three-factor solution, with 24 items, which matched our conceptual framework. The three factors were: 'Conditions for patient participation in bedside handover', 'Level of patient participation in bedside handover' and 'Evaluation of patient participation in bedside handover'. There was strong evidence for factor reliability and validity. Additionally, the correlation between factors was strong. CONCLUSION: This study furthers our conceptual understanding by showing that nurse facilitating behaviours are a strong precursor for patient participation and perceived handover outcomes, justifying the need for nursing training. A robust survey has been developed to measure patient perceptions of participation in bedside handover, which can effectively evaluate this approach to care. Engaging consumers and nurses as research team members was invaluable in ensuring that the survey is acceptable for end-users. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: A health consumer and nurse partnered as members of the research team from study inception to dissemination.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tobiano et al. (2022) conducted a cross-sectional in Hospital inpatients (n=326). Patient participation in bedside handover survey was evaluated on Psychometric properties (factor structure, reliability, validity). A 24-item survey measuring patient perceptions of participation in bedside handover was developed and validated, demonstrating a three-factor structure with strong reliability and validity.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: