Why the study?
Increasing healthcare complexity necessitates effective handover, but while a universal structure is often recommended, many frameworks do not include the patient.
Does bedside handover that includes patients or carers improve outcomes for patients and providers in hospital settings?
Comparison
Bedside handover that includes patients or carers vs conventional handover
Design
Systematic review
Authors
Loading...
Supports patient-inclusive bedside handover for perceived benefits; leaves open superiority on objective outcomes.
Does bedside handover that includes patients or carers improve outcomes for patients and providers in hospital settings?
Patient-centred bedside handover improves patient satisfaction and engagement but faces implementation barriers such as time constraints and increased staff workload.
Maher et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: