Key result
A systematic review of 18 studies on educational interventions to improve handover found they mostly involved single-patient simulations and assessed satisfaction and knowledge/skill improvement.
Why the study?
Do educational interventions improve handover skills and satisfaction among health professionals in acute care settings?
Systematic Review (n=18)
Do educational interventions improve handover skills and satisfaction among health professionals in acute care settings?
Despite increased publications on handover education, the quality of research remains poor, highlighting the need for better methodology and reporting.
Little evidence supports handover curricula improving skills or outcomes; leaves open need for rigorous trials before widespread adoption.
PURPOSE: Effective handovers (handoffs) are vital to patient safety. Medical educators investigated educational interventions to improve handovers in a 2011 systematic review. The number of publications on handover education has increased since then, so authors undertook this updated review. METHOD: The authors considered studies involving educational interventions to improve handover amongst undergraduate or postgraduate health professionals in acute care settings. In September 2016, two authors independently conducted a standardized search of online databases and completed a data extraction and quality assessment of the articles included. They conducted a content analysis of and extracted key themes from the interventions described. RESULTS: Eighteen reports met the inclusion criteria. All but two were based in the United States. Interventions most commonly involved single-patient exercises based on simulation and role-play. Many studies mentioned multiprofessional education or practice, but interventions occurred largely in single-professional contexts. Analysis of interventions revealed three major themes: facilitating information management, reducing the potential for errors, and improving confidence. The majority of studies assessed Kirkpatrick's outcomes of satisfaction and knowledge/skill improvement (Levels 1 and 2). The strength of conclusions was generally weak. CONCLUSIONS: Despite increased interest in and publications on handover, the quality of published research remains poor. Inadequate reporting of interventions, especially as they relate to educational theory, pedagogy, curricula, and resource requirements, continues to impede replication. Weaknesses in methodologies, length of follow-up, and scope of outcomes evaluation (Kirkpatrick levels) persist. Future work to address these issues, and to consider the role of multiprofessional and multiple-patient handovers, is vital.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gordon et al. (2018) conducted a systematic review in Handover in health care (n=18). Educational interventions was evaluated on Kirkpatrick's outcomes of satisfaction and knowledge/skill improvement (Levels 1 and 2). A systematic review of 18 studies on educational interventions to improve handover found they mostly involved single-patient simulations and assessed satisfaction and knowledge/skill improvement.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: