Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Taking the “Broadband China” policy (BCP) as a quasi-natural experiment, this paper utilizes nationwide tracking data from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Survey (CHARLS) for 2011, 2013, 2015, and 2018 and employs a Difference-in-Differences (DID) model to evaluate whether and how urban information infrastructure development affects resident health. We identify a clear and significant improvement in health outcomes attributable to BCP. After the implementation of BCP, physical health and mental health increase by 2.5% and 1.7%, respectively. Furthermore, mechanism analysis confirms that BCP enhances resident health primarily by improving information and communication technology (ICT) levels and by promoting local economic development. The positive health effect of BCP is more pronounced in regions with a better medical environment, suggesting the presence of complementary public-service capacity. At the individual level, heterogeneity tests reveal that BCP exerts a stronger positive influence on the physical health of male and rural respondents, while the benefits for older respondents are relatively smaller. At the city level, the health-promoting effect of BCP is stronger in economically less developed regions, and cities with higher administrative status exhibit more substantial health improvements.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhao et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: