Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The performance of two-level on-chip caching is investigated for a range of technology and architecture assumptions. The area and access time of each level of cache is modeled in detail. The results indicate that for most workloads, two-level cache configurations (with a set-associative second level) perform marginally better than single-level cache configurations that require the same chip area once the first-level cache sizes are 64 KB or larger. Two-level configurations become even more important in systems with no off-chip cache and in systems in which the memory cells in the first-level caches are multiported and hence larger than those in the second-level cache. Finally, a new replacement policy called two-level exclusive caching is introduced. Two-level exclusive caching improves the performance of two-level caching organizations by increasing the effective associativity and capacity.< <ETX xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">></ETX>
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jouppi et al. (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 7 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: