Key result
Participants with metabolic syndrome and a low education level had a significantly higher likelihood of depression compared to those without metabolic syndrome and a high education level (OR 4.18).
Why the study?
Depression patterns vary with socioeconomic status and metabolic syndrome, but the nature of this combined association remains poorly understood.
Does the combination of metabolic syndrome and low socioeconomic status increase the prevalence of depression in Korean adults?
Cross-Sectional (n=24,102)
Does the combination of metabolic syndrome and low socioeconomic status increase the prevalence of depression in Korean adults?
Effect estimate: OR 4.18 (95% CI 2.36-6.75)
The combination of metabolic syndrome and low socioeconomic status is strongly associated with a higher prevalence of depression, highlighting the need for integrated management strategies.
Metabolic syndrome with low education was associated with higher depression odds; hypothesis-generating for combined risk assessment in Korean adults.
BACKGROUND: Depression shows different patterns depending on socioeconomic status (SES) and metabolic syndrome (MS). However, the nature of this association remains poorly understood. The aim of this study was to examine whether the combination of MS and lower SES was associated with the prevalence of depression, based on data from the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES). METHODS: Data were obtained from a cross-sectional study of 24,102 adults (> 19 years of age) who participated in the KNHANES during 2008-2013 and for whom MS and depression data were available. MS was defined using the diagnostic criteria of the modified National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III. Measure of depression was ascertained from self-reports of physician diagnosis. Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the association between depression and MS as well as SES (alone and in combination). RESULTS: Overall, 622 of the 24,102 subjects (2.6%) met the criteria for depression. The prevalence of depression was associated with MS, a lower high-density lipoprotein cholesterol level, an elevated triglyceride level, a lower education level, and a lower household income. Participants with MS and a low SES had a higher likelihood of depression than those without MS and a high SES (odds ratio [OR] = 4.180 for low education level and OR = 3.994 for low household income level). CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that the combination of SES and MS may play an important role in depression, which has implications for healthcare policy and depression management.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kim et al. (2020) conducted a cross-sectional in Depression (n=24,102). Metabolic syndrome and low socioeconomic status vs. No metabolic syndrome and high socioeconomic status was evaluated on Prevalence of depression (OR 4.18, 95% CI 2.36-6.75). Participants with metabolic syndrome and a low education level had a significantly higher likelihood of depression compared to those without metabolic syndrome and a high education level (OR 4.18).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: