Key result
Genetically proxied SGLT2 inhibition shows no association with VTE, DVT, or PE.
Why the study?
SGLT2 inhibitors have established cardiorenal benefits, but their genetic causal association with venous thromboembolism remains uncertain.
Does SGLT2 inhibition affect the risk of venous thromboembolism, deep vein thrombosis, or pulmonary embolism?
Observational
Does SGLT2 inhibition affect the risk of venous thromboembolism, deep vein thrombosis, or pulmonary embolism?
Effect estimate: ROR 0.51 (95% CI 0.42-0.64)
p-value: p=>0.05
Genetically proxied SGLT2 inhibition and pharmacovigilance data show no causal association with venous thromboembolism, supporting the thrombotic safety of SGLT2 inhibitors.
Supports SGLT2 inhibitor thrombotic safety; leaves open confirmation in randomized trials.
Background Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors are widely used antidiabetic agents with established cardiorenal benefits, yet their genetic causal association with venous thromboembolism (VTE) remains uncertain. Methods We employed a multifaceted approach to investigate the causal relationship between SGLT2 inhibition and VTE, as well as deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE). Drug-target Mendelian randomization (MR) and summary-data-based MR (SMR) analyses were conducted using genetic variants proxying SGLT2 inhibition, derived from SLC5A2 expression quantitative trait loci and glycemic traits. Positive control analyses confirmed validity using type 2 diabetes outcomes. Meta-analyses were performed across multiple independent genome-wide association study datasets. Complementary pharmacovigilance analysis was conducted using the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) to assess disproportionality of SGLT2 inhibitor-related VTE reports. Results Genetically proxied SGLT2 inhibition was significantly associated with reduced risk of type 2 diabetes (P < 0.05), validating its robustness. Most MR analyses showed no consistent causal association with VTE, DVT, or PE across datasets, and meta-analyses yielded non-significant pooled estimates (all P > 0.05). SMR analyses revealed no association between SLC5A2 expression and VTE-related outcomes (all P_SMR > 0.05). FAERS disproportionality analysis also identified no safety signals for PE (reporting odds ratio [ROR] = 0.51; 95% CI: 0.42–0.64) or DVT (ROR = 0.54; 95% CI: 0.45–0.64). Conclusions This integrative study provides consistent evidence that SGLT2 inhibition is not causally associated with VTE, DVT, or PE, supporting its thrombotic safety. However, generalizability to non-European populations requires future validation in diverse cohorts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Venous thromboembolism (VTE), deep vein thrombosis (DVT), and pulmonary embolism (PE). Genetically proxied SGLT2 inhibition was evaluated on Venous thromboembolism (VTE), deep vein thrombosis (DVT), and pulmonary embolism (PE) (ROR 0.51, 95% CI 0.42-0.64, p=>0.05). Genetically proxied SGLT2 inhibition showed no causal association with VTE, DVT, or PE (all P>0.05), supported by pharmacovigilance data showing no safety signals for PE (ROR 0.51; 95% CI 0.42-0.64).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: