Key result
CYP2C19 metabolizer phenotype is not associated with ADP-induced platelet aggregation in acute ischemic stroke.
Why the study?
Patient response to clopidogrel varies due to CYP2C19 genetic polymorphisms, and the impact of CYP2C19 phenotypes on platelet aggregation in acute ischemic stroke patients is unclear.
Does CYP2C19 metabolizer phenotype reliably predict ADP-induced platelet aggregation in patients with acute ischemic stroke on clopidogrel?
Cohort (n=112)
Yes
Does CYP2C19 metabolizer phenotype reliably predict ADP-induced platelet aggregation in patients with acute ischemic stroke on clopidogrel?
Absolute Event Rate: 35.7% vs 38.2%
p-value: p=0.49
CYP2C19 metabolizer phenotype does not reliably predict ADP-induced platelet aggregation in stroke patients on clopidogrel, highlighting the value of complementary functional platelet testing in clinical practice.
CYP2C19 genotyping should not yet guide clopidogrel response in acute stroke; leaves open whether functional platelet testing improves prediction.
BackgroundPatient response to clopidogrel varies due to CYP2C19 genetic polymorphisms. Impaired metabolism has been linked to an increased risk of recurrent ischemic events. The purpose of this study was to examine CYP2C19 phenotypes and the impact on ADP aggregation in whole blood platelet aggregometry (WBPA) in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS).MethodsPatients with AIS or transient ischemic attack (TIA) from two academic comprehensive stroke centers between January 2022 and May 2025 were retrospectively reviewed. Inclusion criteria required both CYP2C19 genotyping and WBPA. Categorical variables were compared using chi-square test and continuous variables using Mann-Whitney U test. Multivariable logistic regression identified independent predictors of inadequate platelet inhibition defined by ADP aggregation threshold.ResultsAmong 112 patients (metabolizers: N=62, non-metabolizers: N=50), there was no correlation between CYP2C19 metabolizer phenotype and ADP-induced platelet aggregation (p=0.49). The study found substantial racial (p=0.012) and Hispanic ethnic (p=0.001) differences in metabolizer phenotype. Inadequate platelet inhibition was also associated with age (p=0.020) loading phase (p=0.04), underscoring the need to consider demographic variables, patient characteristics, and the timing of platelet function testing when interpreting platelet reactivity results and making clinical decisions.ConclusionThis study found no significant association between an individual's CYP2C19 metabolizer status and ADP-induced platelet aggregation. The results of this study may help advance understanding of pharmacogenomics, but care must be taken when interpreting them due to this study's limitations. These findings should be confirmed in a future study.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ravichandran et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Acute Ischemic Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack (n=112). CYP2C19 metabolizer phenotype vs. CYP2C19 non-metabolizer phenotype was evaluated on ADP-induced platelet aggregation (p=0.49). CYP2C19 metabolizer phenotype was not significantly associated with ADP-induced platelet aggregation compared to non-metabolizer phenotype (35.7 vs. 38.2 units; p=0.49) in acute ischemic stroke.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: