Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Retrospective analysis reveals billing claim adjustments reduce service utilization across Medicaid programs, indicating that peer review alters subsequent physician practice patterns.
To determine whether adjustment of billing claims made by a peer-review mechanism affects subsequent practice patterns, we examined the records of the San Joaquin Foundation for Medical Care for services rendered Medi-Cal patients. For 13 of 15 procedures studied (six types of injections, six types of physician visits and three laboratory tests), a statistically significant relation was found between the percentage of billing claims adjusted by the peer-review process and subsequent changes in practice patterns as measured by decreases in the rate of change in the monthly number (i.e., the regression-line slopes) of these services claimed. The magnitude and consistency of these relations, however, were not uniform for all procedures, indicating a need for ongoing monitoring of the review process to allocate review resources effectively. (N Engl J Med 291: 877–883, 1974)
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Buck et al. (1974) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: