Key result
The difference between left and right ventricular Myocardial Performance Index (∆MPI) significantly correlated with interventricular mechanical delay (r = 0.44, p < 0.001) in heart failure patients.
Why the study?
There is no consensus on the best method for estimating ventricular dyssynchrony and selecting patients with heart failure for cardiac resynchronization therapy.
Does ∆MPI correlate with established markers of interventricular dyssynchrony in patients with chronic heart failure?
Observational (n=40)
No
Does ∆MPI correlate with established markers of interventricular dyssynchrony in patients with chronic heart failure?
Effect estimate: r = 0.44
p-value: p=<0.001
The difference between left and right ventricular Myocardial Performance Index (∆MPI) correlates with established markers of dyssynchrony and may help select heart failure patients for cardiac resynchronization therapy.
May aid dyssynchrony assessment in HF; hypothesis-generating for CRT selection pending prospective validation.
Aims: Patients with heart failure (HF) exhibit ventricular dyssynchrony with negative effects on ventricular systolic and diastolic performance and poor prognosis. There is no consensus about the best approach for estimating the dyssynchrony and for selecting candidates for resynchronization therapy (CRT). We sought to evaluate whether Myocardial Performance Index (MPI), calculated as differences between left and right ventricle (LV, RV), ∆MPI, represents a marker of interventricular dyssynchrony. Methods: The study included 40 patients (22 males, 18 females, mean age 71±13) with NYHA functional class II-III, chronic heart failure (77% ischaemic), in optimal drug therapy for at least three months. All patients underwent a complete two-dimensional and Tissue Doppler Echocardiography (TDE), including an assessment of MPI in both ventricles. Results: Significant correlations were found between ∆MPI and QRS (r = 0.41, p < 0.001), with NYHA (r = 0.66, p < 0.001), with SPWMD (r = 0.32, p < 0.05), with LV ejection fraction (r = -0.32, p < 0.05), with Spv wave at the septal site of LV (r = -0.32, p < 0.05), and with IVMD (r = 0.44, p < 0.001). Ten patients have been re-evaluated six months after CRT implantation, and ∆MPI significantly correlated with the difference between basal LVEF and six months after CRT implantation (r = 0.43, p < 0.04). Conclusion: The ∆MPI could represent an integrative marker of interventricular dyssynchrony and could be considered as a new parameter in the patient selection process to be undergone CRT.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pattoneri et al. (2020) conducted an observational in Chronic heart failure (n=40). ∆MPI (difference between left and right ventricle Myocardial Performance Index) was evaluated on Correlation between ∆MPI and interventricular mechanical delay (IVMD) (r = 0.44, p=<0.001). The difference between left and right ventricular Myocardial Performance Index (∆MPI) significantly correlated with interventricular mechanical delay (r = 0.44, p < 0.001) in heart failure patients.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: