Key result
In a computational model, multisite pacing with one site on the LV free wall opposite the scar and one opposite the septum achieved the highest dP/dtmax increase compared to isolated RV pacing.
Why the study?
Multisite pacing may increase cardiac resynchronization therapy response rates, but its effect in the presence of myocardial scars is not fully understood.
Does multisite pacing improve maximum LV pressure gradient compared to isolated RV pacing in a computational model of a left ventricle with myocardial scars?
Does multisite pacing improve maximum LV pressure gradient compared to isolated RV pacing in a computational model of a left ventricle with myocardial scars?
In silico modeling suggests that placing pacing electrodes dependent on scar location during multisite pacing may optimize acute hemodynamics in cardiac resynchronization therapy.
Hypothesis-generating for scar-tailored multisite pacing in CRT models; clinical studies needed before guiding lead placement.
Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is a frequently effective treatment modality for dyssynchronous heart failure, however, 30% of patients do not respond, usually due to suboptimal activation of the left ventricle (LV). Multisite pacing (MSP) may increase the response rate, but its effect in the presence of myocardial scars is not fully understood. We use a computational model to study the outcome of MSP in an LV with scars in two different locations and of two different sizes. The LV was stimulated from anterior, posterior and lateral locations individually and in pairs, while a septal stimulation site represented right ventricular (RV) pacing. Intraventricular pressures were measured, and outcomes evaluated in terms of maximum LV pressure gradient (dP/dtmax)- change compared to isolated RV pacing. The best result obtained using various LV pacing locations included a combination of sites remote from scars and the septum. The highest dP/dtmax increase was achieved, regardless of scar size, using MSP with one pacing site located on the LV free wall opposite to the scar and one site opposite to the septum. These in silico modelling results suggest that making placement of pacing electrodes dependent on location of scarring, may alter acute haemodynamics and that such modelling may contribute to future CRT optimization.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Albatat et al. (2020) studied Dyssynchronous heart failure with myocardial scars. Multisite pacing (MSP) vs. Isolated right ventricular (RV) pacing was evaluated on Maximum LV pressure gradient (dP/dtmax) change. In a computational model, multisite pacing with one site on the LV free wall opposite the scar and one opposite the septum achieved the highest dP/dtmax increase compared to isolated RV pacing.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: