Why the study?
Does multi-site left ventricular pacing improve acute haemodynamic response compared to single-site pacing in patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy?
Population
20 patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy
Comparison
Multi-site left ventricular pacing vs Single-site LV pacing and intrinsic rhythm
Design
Cohort
Follow-up
acute
Authors
Loading...
May favor multi-site LV pacing for acute CRT response; hypothesis-generating and requires randomized confirmation before practice change.
Does multi-site left ventricular pacing improve acute haemodynamic response compared to single-site pacing in patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy?
Multi-site LV pacing increases acute haemodynamic response compared to single-site pacing, offering particular benefit for patients with postero-lateral scar identified on CMR.
Ginks et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: