Cross-sectional study reveals lack of privacy outweighs noise disturbance in driving acoustic dissatisfaction among open-plan office workers, suggesting speech privacy requires prioritized mitigation.
Open-plan offices are well-known to be adversely affected by acoustic issues. This study aims to model acoustic dissatisfaction using measurements of room acoustics and sound environment during occupancy, and occupant surveys (n = 349) in 28 offices representing a diverse range of workplace parameters. As latent factors, the contribution of lack of privacy (LackPriv) was 25% higher than noise disturbance in predicting acoustic dissatisfaction (AcDsat). Room acoustic metrics based on sound pressure level (SPL) decay of speech (Lp,A,s,4m and rC) were better in predicting these factors than distraction distance (rD) based on speech transmission index. This contradicts previous findings, which may partly be due to the cross-sectional study design. Specifically, the trends for SPL-based metrics in predicting AcDsat and LackPriv go against expectations based on ISO 3382-3. For sound during occupation, LA,90 and psychoacoustic loudness (N90) predicted AcDsat, and a SPL fluctuation metric (MA,eq) predicted LackPriv. However, these metrics were weaker predictors than ISO 3382-3 metrics. Medium-sized offices exhibited higher dissatisfaction than larger (≥50 occupants) offices. Dissatisfaction varied substantially across parameters including ceiling heights, number of workstations, and years of work, but not between offices with fixed seating compared to more flexible and activity-based working configurations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yadav et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: