This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Background and Aims The preventive effect of nucleos(t)ide analog (NA) use on HCC development in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) is controversial due to the difficulty of conducting randomized controlled trials. Approach and Results In this single-center, retrospective study, NA-naïve CHB patients without a history of HCC were enrolled and followed-up from the first visit on or after January 2000 to December 2020. Patients were categorized into the NA group, including those who started NA after study enrollment, and the non-NA group, including patients to whom NA was never administered during the follow-up period. After propensity score matching (PSM) to balance the confounding factors, we applied a multivariable time-dependent Cox proportional regression analysis with the initiation of NA as a time-dependent covariate. We further performed a subgroup analysis according to the presence or absence of cirrhosis. The baseline characteristics of 212 pairs of patients retrieved by PSM were comparable. During the mean follow-up of 12.9 and 6.8 years in the NA and non-NA groups, respectively, 25 and 28 patients developed HCC, respectively. Multivariable analysis with time-dependent covariates showed that NA did not affect HCC risk (HR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.36–1.31; p = 0.25) after adjusting for other risk factors, including age, sex, and HBV viral load. Subgroup analysis showed that NA use significantly reduced the risk of HCC in cirrhotic patients (HR, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.08–0.85; p = 0.03). Conclusions The preventive effect of NA on hepatocarcinogenesis may be limited to cirrhotic patients.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Moriyama et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: