Key result
Computational modeling demonstrated that the improved response to left ventricular endocardial pacing (ENDO-CRT) is mediated by early access to fast-conducting endocardial tissue.
Why the study?
Does left ventricular endocardial pacing improve myocardial activation times compared to epicardial pacing in computational models?
Does left ventricular endocardial pacing improve myocardial activation times compared to epicardial pacing in computational models?
Computational modeling demonstrates that the improved response to LV endocardial pacing in CRT is mediated by early access to fast-conducting endocardial tissue.
Supports endocardial pacing rationale in CRT models; leaves open translation to patient outcomes.
BACKGROUND: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) delivered via left ventricular (LV) endocardial pacing (ENDO-CRT) is associated with improved acute hemodynamic response compared with LV epicardial pacing (EPI-CRT). The role of cardiac anatomy and physiology in this improved response remains controversial. We used computational electrophysiological models to quantify the role of cardiac geometry, tissue anisotropy, and the presence of fast endocardial conduction on myocardial activation during ENDO-CRT and EPI-CRT. METHODS AND RESULTS: Cardiac activation was simulated using the monodomain tissue excitation model in 2-dimensional (2D) canine and human and 3D canine biventricular models. The latest activation times (LATs) for LV endocardial and biventricular epicardial tissue were calculated (LVLAT and TLAT), as well the percentage decrease in LATs for endocardial (en) versus epicardial (ep) LV pacing (defined as %dLV=100×(LVLATep-LVLATen)/LVLATep and %dT=100×(TLATep-TLATen)/TLATep, respectively). Normal canine cardiac anatomy is responsible for %dLV and %dT values of 7.4% and 5.5%, respectively. Concentric and eccentric remodeled anatomies resulted in %dT values of 15.6% and 1.3%, respectively. The 3D biventricular-paced canine model resulted in %dLV and %dT values of -7.1% and 1.5%, in contrast to the experimental observations of 16% and 11%, respectively. Adding fast endocardial conduction to this model altered %dLV and %dT to 13.1% and 10.1%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our results provide a physiological explanation for improved response to ENDO-CRT. We predict that patients with viable fast-conducting endocardial tissue or distal Purkinje network or both, as well as concentric remodeling, are more likely to benefit from reduced ATs and increased synchrony arising from endocardial pacing.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hyde et al. (2015) studied Cardiac resynchronization therapy. Left ventricular endocardial pacing (ENDO-CRT) vs. Left ventricular epicardial pacing (EPI-CRT) was evaluated on Latest activation times (LATs) for LV endocardial and biventricular epicardial tissue. Computational modeling demonstrated that the improved response to left ventricular endocardial pacing (ENDO-CRT) is mediated by early access to fast-conducting endocardial tissue.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: