Key result
Dulaglutide plus dapagliflozin improves microvascular glycocalyx integrity vs. DPP-4 inhibitors in diabetic kidney disease.
Why the study?
Diabetic nephropathy is associated with arterial elasticity and endothelial function, but the comparative effects of combined dulaglutide and dapagliflozin versus DPP-4 inhibitors on these parameters remained to be evaluated.
Does the combination of dulaglutide and dapagliflozin improve endothelial glycocalyx, arterial stiffness, myocardial function, and albuminuria in patients with T2DM and albuminuria compared to DPP-4 inhibitors?
RCT (n=60)
Observer-blinded
Randomized
No
Does the combination of dulaglutide and dapagliflozin improve endothelial glycocalyx, arterial stiffness, myocardial function, and albuminuria in patients with T2DM and albuminuria compared to DPP-4 inhibitors?
Absolute Event Rate: 1.93% vs 2.08%
p-value: p=<0.001
The combination of dulaglutide and dapagliflozin significantly improves arterial stiffness, endothelial function, myocardial function, and albuminuria compared to DPP-4 inhibitors in patients with T2DM and albuminuria.
Combination dulaglutide-dapagliflozin improves endothelial glycocalyx vs DPP-4 inhibitors in T2DM with albuminuria; extends RCT evidence for dual GLP-1RA/SGLT2i therapy.
Background: The association between diabetic nephropathy and arterial elasticity and endothelial function is well established. In this study, we compared the effect of the combination of dulaglutide and dapagliflozin versus DPP-4 inhibitors on the endothelial glycocalyx, arterial stiffness, myocardial function, and albuminuria. Methods: Overall, 60 patients were randomized to combined dulaglutide and dapagliflozin treatment (n = 30) or DPP-4 inhibitors (DPP-4i, n = 30) (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT06611904). We measured at baseline and 4 and 12 months post-treatment: (i) the perfused boundary region of the sublingual arterial microvessels, (ii) pulse wave velocity (PWV) and central systolic blood pressure (cSBP), (iii) global left ventricular longitudinal strain (GLS), and (iv) urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR). Results: After twelve months, dual therapy showed greater improvements vs. DPP-4i in PBR (2.10 ± 0.31 to 1.93 ± 0.23 μm vs. 2.11 ± 0.31 to 2.08 ± 0.28 μm, p < 0.001), UACR (326 ± 61 to 142 ± 47 mg/g vs. 345 ± 48 to 306 ± 60 mg/g, p < 0.01), and PWV (11.77 ± 2.37 to 10.7 ± 2.29 m/s vs. 10.64 ± 2.44 to 10.54 ± 2.84 m/s, p < 0.001), while only dual therapy showed improvement in cSBP (130.21 ± 17.23 to 123.36 ± 18.42 mmHg). These effects were independent of glycemic control. Both treatments improved GLS, but the effect of dual therapy was significantly higher compared to DPP-4i (18.19% vs. 6.01%, respectively). Conclusions: Twelve-month treatment with dulaglutide and dapagliflozin showed a greater improvement in arterial stiffness, endothelial function, myocardial function, and albuminuria than DPP-4is. Early initiation of combined therapy as an add-on to metformin should be considered in these patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Korakas et al. (2024) conducted an RCT in Type 2 diabetes mellitus and albuminuria (n=60). Dulaglutide and dapagliflozin vs. DPP-4 inhibitors was evaluated on Perfused boundary region (PBR) at 12 months (p=<0.001). Dulaglutide and dapagliflozin significantly improved the perfused boundary region (1.93 vs 2.08 μm, p<0.001) compared to DPP-4 inhibitors in patients with type 2 diabetes and albuminuria.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: