Key result
Dapagliflozin significantly improved resting 1-minute flow-mediated dilation by 3.3% compared to a 1.2% decrease with glibenclamide in patients with type 2 diabetes and subclinical carotid atherosclerosis.
Why the study?
The glucose-lowering independent effect of SGLT2 inhibitors on arterial wall function has not yet been clarified.
Does dapagliflozin improve endothelial function in patients with type 2 diabetes and subclinical carotid atherosclerotic disease compared to glibenclamide?
RCT (n=98)
Open-label
1:1
No
Does dapagliflozin improve endothelial function in patients with type 2 diabetes and subclinical carotid atherosclerotic disease compared to glibenclamide?
Absolute Event Rate: 3.3% vs -1.2%
p-value: p=0.0001
Dapagliflozin significantly improved macro- and microvascular endothelial function compared to glibenclamide in patients with type 2 diabetes and subclinical atherosclerosis, independent of glycemic control.
BACKGROUND: The glucose-lowering independent effect of sodium glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) on arterial wall function has not yet been clarified. This study aims to assess whether SGLT2i treatment can attenuate endothelial dysfunction related to type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D) compared with glucose-lowering equivalent therapy. METHODS: In a prospective, open-label, single-center, randomized clinical trial, 98 patients with T2DM and carotid intima-media thickness above the 75th percentile were randomized 1:1 to 12 weeks of therapy with dapagliflozin or glibenclamide in addition to metformin in glucose-lowering equivalent regimens. The coprimary endpoints were 1-min flow-mediated dilation (FMD) at rest and 1-min FMD after 15 min of ischemia followed by 15 min of reperfusion time (I/R). RESULTS: Ninety-seven patients (61% males, 57 ± 7 years) completed the study. The median HbA1c decreased by - 0.8 (0.7)% and -0.7 (0.95)% following dapagliflozin and glibenclamide, respectively. The first coprimary endpoint, i.e., rest FMD changed by + 3.3(8.2)% and - 1.2(7.5)% for the dapagliflozin and glibenclamide arms, respectively (p = 0.0001). Differences between study arms in the second coprimary endpoint were not significant. Plasma nitrite 1 min after rest FMD was higher for dapagliflozin [308(220) nmol/L] than for glibenclamide (258[110] nmol/L; p = 0.028). The resistive indices at 1 min [0.90 (0.11) vs. 0.93 (0.07); p = 0.03] and 5 min [0.93 (0.07) vs. 0.95 (0.05); p = 0.02] were higher for the glibenclamide group than for the dapagliflozin group. Plasma biomarkers for inflammation and oxidative stress did not differ between the treatments. CONCLUSIONS: Dapagliflozin improved micro- and macrovascular endothelial function compared to glibenclamide, regardless of glycemic control in patients with T2DM and subclinical carotid atherosclerotic disease.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Spósito et al. (2021) conducted an RCT in Type 2 diabetes mellitus with subclinical carotid atherosclerotic disease (n=98). Dapagliflozin vs. Glibenclamide (5 mg/day) was evaluated on Change in 1-min flow-mediated dilation (FMD) at rest (p=0.0001). Dapagliflozin significantly improved resting 1-minute flow-mediated dilation by 3.3% compared to a 1.2% decrease with glibenclamide in patients with type 2 diabetes and subclinical carotid atherosclerosis.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: