Key result
Healing Hearts Together tests if an 8-week emotionally focused intervention improves relationship quality after cardiac events.
Why the study?
Couple relationships impact cardiovascular health, with distress worsening risk and positive support improving outcomes, but relationship-enhancement programs for couples with cardiac disease have not been evaluated.
Does the Healing Hearts Together (HHT) intervention improve relationship quality in couples after a cardiac event?
RCT (n=608)
Single-blind
1:1 permuted blocks
No
Does the Healing Hearts Together (HHT) intervention improve relationship quality in couples after a cardiac event?
This protocol outlines a randomized controlled trial to determine if an emotionally focused intervention improves relationship quality and secondary health outcomes in couples following a cardiac event.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Tests emotionally focused couple therapy post-cardiac event; RCT will determine effects on relationship quality.
Introduction: Couple relationships are important for health. Relationship distress is associated with increased incident and prognostic cardiovascular risk, while positive support is linked to heart-healthy behaviors and improved outcomes. This paper describes the study rationale, objectives, design, and methods of the Healing Hearts Together (HHT) randomized controlled trial (RCT). Objectives: The primary objective is to examine the difference in relationship quality between the 8-week HHT intervention group and usual care (UC) at program completion. Secondary objectives include evaluating the impact of HHT on relationship quality at 6 months, and mental health, quality of life, and cardiovascular risk factors measured at 8 weeks and 6 months post-intervention, as compared to usual care. Methods: Patients and their partners are recruited within 6 months of a cardiac event, procedure, or hospitalization and randomized 1:1 to HHT or UC. Assessments occur at baseline, 8 weeks, and 6 months follow-up. Analyses are planned as intention-to-treat, with multi-level analyses of covariance (ANCOVA) for the primary outcome: 8-week relationship quality as measured by the Dyadic Adjustment Scale. Secondary objectives will be evaluated using multi-level modeling for repeated measures. Anticipated results: It is expected that participants randomized to HHT will report higher relationship quality and improved secondary outcomes than will participants in UC. Conclusion: As the first study to evaluate a relationship-enhancement program for couples with cardiac disease, findings will have important clinical implications regarding the effect of relationship interventions on heart health.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tulloch et al. (2025) conducted an RCT in Cardiovascular disease (n=608). Healing Hearts Together (HHT) intervention vs. Usual care was evaluated on Relationship quality at 8 weeks measured by the Dyadic Adjustment Scale (DAS). The Healing Hearts Together randomized controlled trial will evaluate whether an 8-week emotionally focused intervention improves relationship quality compared to usual care after a cardiac event.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: