Why the study?
Calcific aortic valve disease etiology involves environmental and genetic factors, prompting investigation into whether Lp(a) levels and gene polymorphisms are associated with calcific aortic stenosis.
Do elevated Lp(a) levels and specific Lp(a) gene polymorphisms increase the risk of calcific aortic valve disease in older adults?
Case-Control (n=152)
No
Do elevated Lp(a) levels and specific Lp(a) gene polymorphisms increase the risk of calcific aortic valve disease in older adults?
Absolute Event Rate: 97.33% vs 24.68%
p-value: p=<0.001
Elevated Lp(a) levels and specific genetic polymorphisms (rs10455872 AA genotype and rs3798220 TT genotype) are significantly associated with the presence of calcific aortic valve disease in the Turkish population.
Calcific aortic valve disease (CAVD) is a multifactorial condition. Both environmental andgenetic factors play an important role in its etiology. CAVD exhibits a broad spectrum, varying frommild valve thickening to severe valve calcification and stenosis. Progression of the disease consistsof chronic inflammation, lipoprotein deposition, and active leaflet calcification. It is a process similarto coronary artery disease. In this study, we investigated Lp(a) levels and gene polymorphismsassociated with calcific aortic stenosis from blood samples after echocardiography in the evaluationof 75 patients diagnosed with CAVD and 77 controls. Blood tests were run in our laboratory to ruleout certain risk factors before echocardiography examination. A significant association amongsmoking, elevated LDL level and creatinine, low albumin levels, Lp(a) level, rs10455872, andrs3798220 polymorphisms may be considered genetic risk factors for the development of calcificaortic stenosis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Özkan et al. (2019) conducted a case-control in Calcific aortic valve disease (CAVD) (n=152). Lp(a) levels and rs10455872/rs3798220 gene polymorphisms vs. Controls without CAVD was evaluated on Frequency of rs10455872 AA genotype in CAVD patients versus controls (p=<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: