Key result
Advection-pressure splitting schemes improve computational efficiency over standard methods for 1D blood flow equations.
Why the study?
Previous non-conservative blood flow models only considered arteries, a momentum correction coefficient of one, lacked passive scalar transport, and included fewer discontinuous mechanical and geometrical parameters.
The new splitting-based numerical schemes improve the efficiency of modeling 1D blood flow in arteries and veins with discontinuous properties.
We introduce new first order, splitting‐based numerical schemes for the non‐conservative one‐dimensional (1D) blood flow equations with a general constant momentum correction coefficient that describe blood flow, for different velocity profiles, in arteries and veins with discontinuous mechanical and geometrical properties. In this model an advection equation for a passive scalar transport is also considered. Our schemes are inspired by the original flux vector splitting approach of Toro and Vázquez‐Cendón (2012) designed for the Euler equations. They also represent an improvement of the work proposed by Toro et al. (2024) regarding non‐conservative blood flow models, which considered a tube law describing only arteries, a momentum correction coefficient equal to one, no passive scalar transport and included a smaller number of discontinuous mechanical and geometrical parameters. The considered framework separates advection terms and pressure terms, generating two different systems of PDEs: the advection system in conservative form, and the pressure system in non‐conservative form, both of which have a very simple eigenstructure compared to that of the full system. Our schemes involve approximate Riemann solvers and present a modification of the path‐conservative framework that renders unnecessary the use of a path. They are systematically assessed on a carefully designed suite of test problems with exact solution and compared with several existing mainstream methods. A detailed efficiency analysis is performed in order to showcase the advantages of the proposed methodology in comparison with standard approaches.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Spilimbergo et al. (2025) studied Blood flow modeling. Advection-pressure splitting schemes vs. Existing mainstream methods was evaluated on Efficiency and accuracy on test problems. The proposed advection-pressure splitting schemes for 1D blood flow equations demonstrated improved efficiency compared to standard approaches on test problems with exact solutions.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: