Key result
RCT tests cryoballoon vs. radiofrequency ablation for silent cerebral embolisms in AF.
Why the study?
Catheter ablation of AF carries a risk of thromboembolic complications and silent cerebral embolisms, yet prospective data comparing cerebral embolism incidence between cryoballoon and radiofrequency ablation are scarce.
Does cryoballoon ablation prevent MRI-detected silent cerebral embolisms compared to radiofrequency ablation in patients with atrial fibrillation?
RCT (n=230)
Open-label
1:1
Yes
Does cryoballoon ablation prevent MRI-detected silent cerebral embolisms compared to radiofrequency ablation in patients with atrial fibrillation?
This study protocol describes a randomized controlled trial designed to compare the incidence of MRI-detected silent cerebral embolisms between cryoballoon and radiofrequency ablation in patients with atrial fibrillation.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Embo-Abl RCT will directly compare silent cerebral embolism rates with cryoballoon versus radiofrequency ablation; leaves open optimal technique until results emerge.
BACKGROUND: Although catheter ablation (CA) has become a standard therapeutic approach to atrial fibrillation (AF), it imposes a low but relevant risk of thromboembolic complications of around 0.5%-1%, including ischemic strokes, and has an additional risk of clinically silent cerebral embolisms (SCEs) of 10%-40%. Both cryoballoon (CB) and radiofrequency (RF) ablation are routinely used clinically worldwide, yet there are few prospective data comparing the incidence of cerebral embolism after CA of AF between CB and RF ablation. METHODS: The aim of the Embo-Abl study will be to compare the incidence of cerebral embolisms on 3 T diffusion-weighted image magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) after CA of AF between CB and RF ablation in patients with AF in a prospective, multicenter, open-label, controlled, randomized fashion. The primary endpoint of the Embo-Abl study will be the occurrence of MRI-detected SCE 1-3 days after CA. The patients will be registered and randomly assigned to either the CB or RF ablation group in a 1:1 ratio. The study cohort will include 230 patients with AF from a multicenter in Japan. RESULTS: The results of this study are currently under investigation. CONCLUSION: The Embo-Abl study will be the first to compare the incidence of periprocedural cerebral embolisms caused by CA of AF between CB and RF ablation in a prospective, multicenter, randomized, controlled fashion.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Miyamoto et al. (2022) conducted an RCT in Atrial fibrillation (n=230). Cryoballoon ablation vs. Radiofrequency ablation was evaluated on Occurrence of MRI-detected silent cerebral embolisms (SCEs) 1-3 days after catheter ablation. The Embo-Abl study is a planned randomized controlled trial designed to evaluate whether cryoballoon ablation is noninferior to radiofrequency ablation regarding the incidence of silent cerebral embolisms in 230 patients with atrial fibrillation.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: