Key result
Ongoing CRABL-HF trial compares cryoballoon versus radiofrequency ablation for AF in HF.
Why the study?
Little data exist regarding the differences in efficacy and safety between cryoballoon and radiofrequency ablation of AF in patients with heart failure.
Does cryoballoon ablation reduce the occurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmias compared to radiofrequency ablation in patients with heart failure (LVEF ≤40%) and atrial fibrillation?
RCT (n=110)
Open-label
1:1
Yes
Does cryoballoon ablation reduce the occurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmias compared to radiofrequency ablation in patients with heart failure (LVEF ≤40%) and atrial fibrillation?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Results from this ongoing RCT are pending; leaves open optimal ablation strategy for AF in HFrEF.
BACKGROUND: Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) is increasingly performed worldwide in patients with heart failure (HF). However, it has been recently emphasized that AF ablation in patients with HF is associated with increased risks of procedure-related complications and mortality. There are little data about the differences in the efficacy and safety between cryoballoon (CB) and radiofrequency (RF) ablation of AF in patients with HF. METHODS: The CRABL-HF study is designed as a prospective, multicenter, open-label, controlled, and randomized clinical trial comparing the efficacy and safety of AF ablation between CB and RF ablation in patients with HF (LVEF ≤40%) (UMIN Clinical Trials Registry UMIN000032433). The CRABL-HF study will consist of 110 patients at multicenter in Japan. The patients will be registered and randomly assigned to either the CB ablation or RF ablation group with a 1:1 allocation. The primary endpoint of this study is the occurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmias (ATs) at 1 year with a blanking period of 90 days after ablation. Key secondary endpoints are the success rate of the pulmonary vein isolation, total procedural time, left atrial dwelling time, total fluoroscopy time, radiation exposure, complication rate, composite of all-cause mortality or HF hospitalizations, cardiovascular events, change in left ventricular ejection fraction, and change in quality of life. RESULTS: The results of this study are currently under investigation. CONCLUSION: The CRABL-HF study is being conducted to compare the efficacy and safety of catheter ablation of AF between CB and RF ablation in patients with HF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Miyamoto et al. (2020) conducted an RCT in Atrial fibrillation with heart failure (n=110). Cryoballoon ablation vs. Radiofrequency ablation was evaluated on Occurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmias (ATs) at 1 year with a blanking period of 90 days after ablation. The CRABL-HF study is an ongoing randomized trial designed to compare cryoballoon versus radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation in 110 patients with heart failure.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: