Key result
High coronary collateralization limits baseline infarct size but has no significant impact on myocardial reperfusion, left ventricular function, or major cardiovascular events at 6 months compared to low collateralization.
Why the study?
Does high baseline coronary collateralization improve myocardial reperfusion and clinical outcomes in STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI?
Observational (n=389)
Does high baseline coronary collateralization improve myocardial reperfusion and clinical outcomes in STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI?
Early recruitment of coronary collaterals limits baseline infarct size but does not significantly impact post-PCI myocardial reperfusion, left ventricular function, or 6-month clinical outcomes in STEMI patients.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
High collaterals should not guide STEMI reperfusion strategy; leaves open whether enhancing them improves post-PCI outcomes.
BACKGROUND: Collaterals to occluded infarct-related coronary arteries (IRA) have been observed after the onset of acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). We sought to investigate the impact of early coronary collateralization, as evidenced by angiography, on myocardial reperfusion and outcomes after primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). METHODS: Acute procedural results, ST-segment resolution (STR), enzymatic infarct size, echocardiographic left ventricular function, and major adverse cardiac events (MACE) at 6-month follow-up were assessed in 389 patients with STEMI undergoing primary PCI for occluded IRA (TIMI flow grade 0 or 1) within 12 hours of symptom-onset. Angiographic coronary collateralization to the occluded IRA at first contrast injection was graded according to the Rentrop scoring system. RESULTS: Low (Rentrop score of 0 or 1) and high (Rentrop score of 2 or 3) coronary collateralization was detected in 329 and 60 patients, respectively. Patients with high collateralization more commonly had prior stable angina and right coronary artery occlusion, but less often had left anterior descending artery occlusion. At baseline, these patients presented with less extent of ST-segment elevation and lower serum levels of creatine kinase myocardial band (CK-MB) and cardiac troponin I (cTnI). Procedural success rate, STR, corrected TIMI flame count, and area under the curve of CK-MB and cTnI measurements after the procedure were similar between patients with high collateralization and those with low collateralization (for all comparisons P > 0.05). There were no differences in left ventricular ejection fraction and rates of MACE at 6 months according to baseline angiographic collaterals to occluded IRA. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with acute STEMI undergoing primary PCI within 12 hours of symptom-onset, coronary collateralization to the occluded IRA was influenced by clinical and angiographic features. Early recruitment of collaterals limits infarct size at baseline, but has no significant impact on myocardial reperfusion after the procedure and subsequent left ventricular function and clinical outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shen et al. (2014) conducted an observational in Acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) (n=389). High coronary collateralization (Rentrop score 2 or 3) vs. Low coronary collateralization (Rentrop score 0 or 1) was evaluated on Procedural success rate, ST-segment resolution, corrected TIMI frame count, enzymatic infarct size, left ventricular ejection fraction, and MACE (p=> 0.05). High coronary collateralization limits baseline infarct size but has no significant impact on myocardial reperfusion, left ventricular function, or major cardiovascular events at 6 months compared to low collateralization.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: