Why the study?
Can a multifactorial risk index predict postoperative respiratory failure in men after major noncardiac surgery?
Can a multifactorial risk index predict postoperative respiratory failure in men after major noncardiac surgery?
A validated multifactorial risk index can identify male patients at risk for postoperative respiratory failure after major noncardiac surgery to guide perioperative care.
May aid preoperative identification of high-risk men; leaves open whether targeted interventions reduce postoperative respiratory failure.
OBJECTIVE: To develop and validate a preoperative risk index for predicting postoperative respiratory failure (PRF). SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Respiratory failure is an important postoperative complication. METHOD: Based on a prospective cohort study, cases from 44 Veterans Affairs Medical Centers (n = 81,719) were used to develop the models. Cases from 132 Veterans Affairs Medical Centers (n = 99,390) were used as a validation sample. PRF was defined as mechanical ventilation for more than 48 hours after surgery or reintubation and mechanical ventilation after postoperative extubation. Ventilator-dependent, comatose, do not resuscitate, and female patients were excluded. RESULTS: PRF developed in 2,746 patients (3.4%). The respiratory failure risk index was developed from a simplified logistic regression model and included abdominal aortic aneurysm repair, thoracic surgery, neurosurgery, upper abdominal surgery, peripheral vascular surgery, neck surgery, emergency surgery, albumin level less than 30 g/L, blood urea nitrogen level more than 30 mg/dL, dependent functional status, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and age. CONCLUSIONS: The respiratory failure risk index is a validated model for identifying patients at risk for developing PRF and may be useful for guiding perioperative respiratory care.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Arozullah et al. (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: