Why the study?
Although anatomical CTA and myocardial perfusion imaging are standard care, imaging processes driving atherosclerotic plaque progression and rupture, such as inflammation and active calcification, may further enhance coronary artery disease risk stratification.
Does non-invasive imaging with PET and CTA improve risk stratification in patients with coronary artery disease?
Does non-invasive imaging with PET and CTA improve risk stratification in patients with coronary artery disease?
Advanced non-invasive imaging techniques targeting coronary inflammation and microcalcification, such as 18F-NaF PET and CTA-derived PCAT, provide complementary prognostic information that enhances risk stratification in coronary artery disease.
Non-invasive testing plays a pivotal role in the diagnosis, assessment of progression, response to therapy, and risk stratification of coronary artery disease. Although anatomical plaque imaging by computed tomography angiography (CTA) and ischemia detection with myocardial perfusion imaging studies are current standards of care, there is a growing body of evidence that imaging of the processes which drive atherosclerotic plaque progression and rupture has the potential to further enhance risk stratification. In particular, non-invasive imaging of coronary plaque inflammation and active calcification has shown promise in this regard. Positron emission tomography (PET) with newly-adopted radiotracers provides unique insights into atheroma activity acting as a powerful independent predictor of myocardial infarctions. Similarly, by providing a quantitative measure of coronary inflammation, the pericoronary adipose tissue density (PCAT) derived from standard coronary CTA enhances cardiac risk prediction and allows re-stratification over and above current state-of-the-art assessments. In this review, we shall discuss the recent advances in the non-invasive methods of assessment of disease activity by PET and CTA, highlighting how these methods could improve risk stratification and ultimately benefit patients with coronary artery disease.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kwieciński et al. (2023) conducted a review in Coronary artery disease. PET and CTA imaging was evaluated.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: