Why the study?
Does revascularization improve outcomes in patients with chronic ischaemic left ventricular dysfunction and viable myocardium compared to medical therapy?
Does revascularization improve outcomes in patients with chronic ischaemic left ventricular dysfunction and viable myocardium compared to medical therapy?
Assessment of myocardial viability using techniques like myocardial perfusion imaging can guide optimal management and identify patients with ischaemic left ventricular dysfunction who will benefit from revascularization.
Viability assessment may guide revascularization in ischaemic LV dysfunction; leaves open need for randomized confirmation.
There is growing interest in the assessment of myocardial viability in patients with ischaemic left ventricular dysfunction, in an attempt to identify those patients most likely to show functional improvement post-revascularization. Various techniques, focusing on different 'viability characteristics', are currently available. Of these, myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) and dobutamine stress echocardiography are used most often; however, nuclear imaging techniques are more sensitive for the assessment of viable tissue. Revascularization of patients with viable tissue has been shown to improve function, reduce heart failure symptoms, improve exercise capacity and improve survival compared with patients with viable myocardium treated medically. Thus, assessment of viability using MPI may guide optimal management of patients with ischaemic left ventricular dysfunction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jeroen J. Bax (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: