Provides a historical overview of the rationale for thrombolytic therapy in acute myocardial infarction to prevent pump failure.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Historical overview contextualizes thrombolysis rationale in AMI; leaves open its relevance amid modern reperfusion strategies.
WITH the introduction of coronary-care units in the 1960s and the ability to prevent and treat lethal arrhythmias, the mortality from acute myocardial infarction was reduced for the first time. Failure of the cardiac pump subsequently emerged as the principal cause of in-hospital death in patients with myocardial infarction. Unfortunately, the present treatment of pump failure with positive inotropic and vasoactive agents and with circulatory-assist devices has not improved the prognosis any further. In the late 1960s, it was thought that mortality from pump failure might be reduced by attempts to limit the quantity of jeopardized myocardium destined to undergo . . .
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Laffel et al. (1984) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: