Why the study?
Does thrombolytic therapy improve outcomes in patients with acute transmural myocardial infarction?
Does thrombolytic therapy improve outcomes in patients with acute transmural myocardial infarction?
This review summarizes the evolution of thrombolytic therapy for acute transmural myocardial infarction and proposes a management strategy.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May guide early thrombolytic strategies in acute MI; leaves open prospective validation of the proposed program.
Since 1980, many data have been published concerning the pathophysiology of acute myocardial infarction and its effect on mortality. Research has been directed at developing a means of interrupting the evolution of transmural infarction and normalizing blood flow through the infarct-related vessel. Intracoronary delivery of thrombolytic agents has proved to be an effective, albeit logistically limited, means of reperfusion. The use of intravenous agents has broadened the applicability of thrombolytic therapy without severely compromising its efficacy. The recent availability of clot-selective agents has produced the potential of safely interrupting the infarction process at the earliest possible moment. This article reviews the research that has led to our use of thrombolytic agents and proposes a reasonable program of patient management in acute myocardial infarction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Budge H. Smith (1987) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: