Why the study?
Does the presence of terminal QRS distortion on admission ECG predict worse recovery of left ventricular wall motion in patients with anterior acute myocardial infarction?
Does the presence of terminal QRS distortion on admission ECG predict worse recovery of left ventricular wall motion in patients with anterior acute myocardial infarction?
Terminal QRS distortion on admission ECG in anterior AMI is a useful early indicator of severe myocardial damage and poor subsequent recovery of left ventricular wall motion.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Terminal QRS distortion was associated with less wall motion recovery after anterior AMI; hypothesis-generating for risk stratification and requires prospective validation.
In order to clarify the time course of left ventricular (LV) wall motion in patients with anterior acute myocardial infarction (AMI) showing terminal QRS distortion on the admission electrocardiogram (ECG), the present study examined 106 patients with their first anterior AMI (< or =6 h) who underwent emergency coronary arteriography and cardiac cathetherization at 1 and 6 months after the infarction. The patients were classified into 2 groups according to the presence (group A, n=23) or absence (group B, n=83) of terminal QRS distortion (emergence of the J point at > or =50% of the R-wave amplitude in leads with QR configuration and/or absence of S waves in leads with RS configuration) on the admission ECG. Group A had a lower LV ejection fraction and more reduced regional wall motion (RWM) in the infarct region at both 1 and 6 months after AMI than group B. The degree of improvement in RWM between 1 and 6 months after AMI was less in group A than in group B (-0.1+/-0.5 vs 0.4+/-0.6 SD/chord, p<0.01). This study indicates that patients with anterior AMI showing terminal QRS distortion on the admission ECG have more severely depressed LV wall motion and less improvement in RWM in the infarct region in the healing stage, suggesting that this sign is an indicator of severe myocardial damage.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tamura et al. (2001) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: