Why the study?
Using novel biomarkers to predict future AF risk may aid decision-making regarding anticoagulant therapy for stroke prevention.
Does the assessment of non-ECG predictors (echocardiography, blood tests, imaging, anthropometry) predict the development of atrial fibrillation in patients with ischaemic stroke?
Does the assessment of non-ECG predictors (echocardiography, blood tests, imaging, anthropometry) predict the development of atrial fibrillation in patients with ischaemic stroke?
Non-ECG biomarkers such as echocardiographic parameters, natriuretic peptides, anthropometry, and stroke topology are predictive of atrial fibrillation development in ischemic stroke patients.
Supports post-stroke AF surveillance with echo, biomarkers and anthropometrics; extends multimodal predictor evidence for risk stratification.
The use of novel biomarkers to predict future atrial fibrillation (AF) risk may aid decision making with anti-coagulant therapy for stroke prevention. The purpose of our study was to determine whether quantitative echocardiography, blood tests, imaging, anthropometry are predictive of atrial fibrillation. Electrocardiography was not the scope of this review. Incremental increases in atrial volume and atrial diameter were most commonly associated with AF development. Likewise, incremental Brain Natriuretic Peptide (BNP) and N-terminal pro-(BNP) levels also correlate with AF risk. Anthropometric predictors such as BMI, lean mass and fat mass were also predictive of AF. Of studies reporting stroke topology, the presence of cortical infarcts, posterior circulation infarcts, multi-territory infarcts were independently predictive of AF. Newer echocardiographic techniques such as atrial and ventricular strain analysis were shown to be predictive of AF in multiple studies. Use of these biomarkers in composite scoring systems may accurately predict AF development and further help stratify patients that may benefit from anticoagulation for stroke prevention.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bonavia et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: