Why the study?
Given the burden of acute coronary syndromes and the need for novel diagnostic strategies, this review aimed to compile all available data regarding the role of flow-mediated dilatation in the prognosis of patients with ACS.
Does flow-mediated dilatation (FMD) assessment predict prognosis and treatment response in patients with acute coronary syndromes?
Does flow-mediated dilatation (FMD) assessment predict prognosis and treatment response in patients with acute coronary syndromes?
Flow-mediated dilatation is a valuable noninvasive tool for evaluating endothelial function, assessing treatment response, and predicting major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with acute coronary syndromes.
FMD may aid ACS risk stratification and treatment monitoring; confirms endothelial dysfunction marker utility via systematic synthesis.
In the context of the global burden of cardiovascular disease, the development of novel, patient-targeted diagnostic and therapeutic strategies is of paramount importance. Acute coronary syndromes (ACS) comprise a subset of cardiovascular disease, with constantly increasing prevalence requiring urgent attention. Flow-mediated dilatation (FMD), a noninvasive method for the evaluation of endothelial function, has been previously implemented in patients with ACS. A systematic review following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines was conducted in order to identify all relevant studies assessing the implementation of FMD among patients with ACS. Our review reflects an effort to present all available data regarding the role of FMD to date, a valuable noninvasive and easy accessible diagnostic tool, in the prognosis of patients with ACS. FMD evaluation in patients with ACS reveals a decline in values, indicative of the presence of endothelial function among this distinct patient group. FMD has also been used to assess the response to various treatments, as well as to predict major adverse cardiovascular events. Dynamic responses to interventions highlights its potential in the evolving field of interventional cardiology.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zormpas et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: