Why the study?
Does DXA provide a valid and reliable assessment of skeletal age compared to X-ray in youth soccer players?
Does DXA provide a valid and reliable assessment of skeletal age compared to X-ray in youth soccer players?
DXA offers a replicable and lower-radiation method for assessing skeletal age and maturity in youth soccer players compared to traditional X-rays.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
DXA may serve as a lower-radiation alternative for skeletal age assessment in youth athletes; leaves open prospective validation before clinical adoption.
Physical performance is highly dependent on maturity. Therefore, consideration of maturity is recommended in the talent identification process. To date, skeletal age (SA) is assessed using X-ray scans. However, X-rays are associated with a 10-fold higher radiation compared to dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). The aim of the study was to validate SA assessments in male soccer players with the DXA technique. Paired X-ray and DXA scans of the left hand of 63 Swiss U-15 national soccer players were performed. SA assessments were performed twice by two blinded raters using Tanner and Whitehouse' reference technique. Intrarater and interrater reliability as well as agreement between both techniques were tested. Intrarater and interrater reliabilities were excellent. Bland-Altman plots showed that SA assessments between X-ray and DXA differed by -0.2 years and 95% limits of agreement were ±0.6 years. Therefore, DXA offered a replicable method for assessing SA and maturity in youth soccer players.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Romann et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: