Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
It is shown that when resources are privately owned, the institution of voting is irrelevant to the choice of non-exclusive public goods: the total bundle of such goods produced by Society is the same whether or not minority coalitions are permitted to produce them. This is in sharp contrast to the cases of redistribution and of exclusive public goods, where public decisions depend strongly on the vote. The analytic tool used is the Harsanyi-Shapley non-transferable utility value.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Aumann et al. (1983) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: