Why the study?
Although evidence is increasing for digital health programs targeting secondary prevention of stroke, the feasibility of the novel Care Assistant and support Program for people after Stroke (CAPS) or TIA remained to be determined.
Is a multicomponent digital care assistant and support program feasible and acceptable for secondary prevention in patients after stroke or TIA?
Is a multicomponent digital care assistant and support program feasible and acceptable for secondary prevention in patients after stroke or TIA?
A multicomponent digital care assistant program is feasible and acceptable for secondary prevention after stroke or TIA, showing potential improvements in self-efficacy and cardiovascular health.
Supports feasibility of digital secondary prevention post-stroke/TIA; hypothesis-generating pending randomized efficacy trials.
Evidence is increasing for digital health programs targeting the secondary prevention of stroke. We aimed to determine the feasibility of the novel Care Assistant and support Program for people after Stroke (CAPS) or transient ischaemic attack (TIA) by combining person-centred goal setting and risk-factor monitoring through a web-based clinician portal, SMS messages, a mobile application (app), and a wearable device. We conducted a 12-week mixed-methods, open-label feasibility study. Participants (6 months–3 years after stroke or TIA, access to the internet via a smartphone/tablet) were recruited via the Australian Stroke Clinical Registry. Participants set one or two secondary prevention goals with a researcher and provided access and training in technology use. Feasibility outcomes included recruitment, retention, usability, acceptability, and satisfaction. Secondary outcomes included goal attainment, health outcomes, and program costs. Following 600 invitations, 58 responded, 34/36 (94%) eligible participants commenced the program (one withdrawal; 97% retention), and 10 were interviewed. Participants (27% female, 33% TIA) generally rated the usability of the mobile application as ‘Good’ to ‘Excellent’ (System Usability Scale). Most (94%) agreed the program helped with engagement in health self-monitoring. Overall, 52 goals were set, predominantly regarding exercise (21/52), which were the most frequently achieved (9/21). At 12 weeks, participants reported significant improvements (p < 0.05) in self-efficacy (Cohen’s d = 0.40), cardiovascular health (d = 0.71), and the mental health domain of the PROMIS GH (d = 0.63). CAPS was acceptable, with good retention and engagement of participants. Evaluation of this program in a randomised controlled trial is warranted.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Allan et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: