Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Restle's coding theory for movement perception is merged with certain aspects of Johansson's vector descriptions of movement to investigate the relative per-ceptual prominence of several kinds of displays of human walkers. Two versions of a coding model are entertained. The first considers the results of a demon-stration and an experiment in which points of light are mounted in either of two ways: on major joints of the body or off them. Results suggest that on-joint displays are the better figures but that off-joint displays are fully adequate for representing human motion. Vector codes and a system for relating them are developed to reflect these results. This first model, however, is inadequate for a second demonstration in which the spatial relations among the lights are scram-bled. The model's problem lies in the fact that it does not discriminate between a canonical walker display and the spatially anomalous one. Thus, the model is elaborated into a second form to account for the difference. It incorporates what my colleagues and I have called centers of moment. The force of this exercise is to demonstrate the necessity for movements and spatial extent to be coded
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
James E. Cutting (1981) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: