Key result
Transcatheter PFO closure for paradoxical embolism yields zero recurrent strokes without serious complications.
Why the study?
The effect of patent foramen ovale closure on the risk for subsequent strokes after presumed paradoxical embolism is unknown.
Does transcatheter closure of patent foramen ovale prevent recurrent strokes in patients with presumed paradoxical embolism?
Does transcatheter closure of patent foramen ovale prevent recurrent strokes in patients with presumed paradoxical embolism?
Transcatheter closure of patent foramen ovale in patients with presumed paradoxical embolism appears feasible and may reduce the risk of recurrent embolic events.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
PFO closure in presumed paradoxical embolism showed low recurrence in this cohort; leaves open efficacy versus medical therapy in randomized trials.
BACKGROUND: Many have proposed a relation between presence of a patent foramen ovale, with or without atrial septal aneurysm, and cryptogenic stroke. The effect of foramen ovale closure on the risk for subsequent strokes is unknown. METHODS AND RESULTS: Transcatheter closure of a patent foramen ovale was undertaken in 36 patients with known right-to-left atrial shunting and presumed paradoxical emboli (31 strokes, 25 transient neurological events, four systemic arterial emboli, and two brain abscesses). Individual patients had between one and four such events. None had a left heart or carotid source of embolism; 31 of 35 had no known risk factors for stroke. Events occurred in 12 patients while they were taking warfarin. At cardiac catheterization, patent foramina ovalia were significantly larger than predicted for age in 67% of the patients. Implantation of a double-umbrella device in the patent foramen ovale was achieved in all without serious procedural complications. Of 34 who have returned for follow-up, one has a residual atrial communication that may be clinically important, five had trivial leaks, and 28 have complete closure. There have been no strokes during a mean follow-up of 8.4 months. CONCLUSIONS: Transcatheter closure of a patent foramen ovale can be accomplished with little morbidity and may reduce the risk of recurrence. Further investigations directed toward identifying the population at risk and assessing the effect of intervention are warranted.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bridges et al. (1992) studied Patent foramen ovale with presumed paradoxical emboli (n=36). Transcatheter closure of patent foramen ovale using a double-umbrella device was evaluated on Recurrent strokes. Transcatheter closure of patent foramen ovale in patients with presumed paradoxical embolism was achieved without serious complications, with 0 recurrent strokes over a mean follow-up of 8.4 months.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: