Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
How does a robot's sound shape our perception of it? We overlaid sound from high-end and low-end robot arms on videos of the high-end KUKA youBot desktop robotic arm moving a small block in functional (working in isolation) and social (interacting with a human) contexts. The low-end audio was sourced from an inexpensive OWI arm. Crowdsourced participants watched one video each and rated the robot along dimensions of competence, trust, aesthetic, and human-likeness. We found that the presence and quality of sound shapes subjective perception of the KUKA arm. The presence of any sound reduced human-likeness and aesthetic ratings, however the high-end sound rated better in the competence evaluation in the social context measures when compared to no sound. Overall, the social context increased the perceived competence, trust, aesthetic and human-likeness of the robot. Based on motor sound's significant mixed impact on visual perception of robots, we discuss implications for sound design of interactive systems.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tennent et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: