Why the study?
Does a combination of 10 candidate gene SNPs predict coronary heart disease risk?
Does a combination of 10 candidate gene SNPs predict coronary heart disease risk?
A modeled genetic risk score using 10 candidate SNPs suggests that individuals carrying multiple risk alleles have a substantially higher predicted risk of coronary heart disease.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Should not yet change CHD risk assessment; leaves open prospective validation of candidate SNP panels.
Although the risk for coronary heart disease (CHD) associated with single SNPs is modest it has been suggested that, in combination, several common risk-associated alleles could lead to a substantially better heart disease risk prediction. We have modelled this using 10 SNPs in ten candidate genes (APOB, NOS3, APOE, ACE, SERPINE1, MTHFR, ITGA2B, PON 1, LPL, and CETP) and their predicted summary risk estimates from meta-analysis. Based on published allele frequencies, approximately 29% of the general population would be expected to carry less than three risk alleles, approximately 55% would carry 3 or 4 risk alleles, 4% would have 6 and 1% 7 or more risk alleles. Compared to the mean of those with 3 or 4 risk associated genotypes, those with 6 and 7-or-more alleles have a significantly higher risk odds ratio (OR) of CHD (mean OR (95% Confidence Intervals), 1.70 (1.14 to 2.55); and 4.51 (2.89 to 7.04) respectively), while compared to those in the lowest decile of risk, those in the highest decile have a CHD odds ratio in the range of 3.05 (2.24 to 4.14). Taking into account age and the risk alleles carried, the mean 10 year probability for developing CHD for a 55 year old man was calculated to be 15% (8.6% to 24.8%), with nearly 1 in 5 having more than 20% risk. Whether this particular group of 10 SNPs will improve the accuracy of CHD predictions over the combination of classical risk factors in clinical use requires further experimental evidence.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Drenos et al. (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: