Why the study?
Does simvastatin reduce coronary atherosclerotic plaque volume in male patients with hypercholesterolemia and ischemic heart disease?
Does simvastatin reduce coronary atherosclerotic plaque volume in male patients with hypercholesterolemia and ischemic heart disease?
Lipid-lowering therapy with simvastatin 40 mg/d for 12 months significantly reduces coronary atherosclerotic plaque volume as measured by intravascular ultrasound.
Supports plaque regression with simvastatin in this cohort; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
Background— Angiography of the coronary arteries reflects only changes in luminal dimensions. With intravascular ultrasound, cross-sectional images can be obtained and area measurements can be added to calculate volumes of the external elastic membrane (EEM), plaque plus media (P+M), and lumen. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of lipid lowering by simvastatin on coronary atherosclerotic P+M as changes in volumes of EEM, P+M, and lumen. Methods and Results— In 40 male patients with hypercholesterolemia, ischemic heart disease, and a nonsignificant coronary artery lesion in a not previously revascularized coronary artery, serial intravascular ultrasound studies with an ECG-triggered pullback were performed at baseline, after 3 months on a lipid-lowering diet, and after another 12 months on simvastatin 40 mg/d. Mean length of the analyzed atherosclerotic segments was 5.9±3.3 mm. After 12 months on simvastatin, a significant reduction in P+M volume of 6.3% ( P =0.002) was observed, whereas only a nonsignificant reduction in EEM volume of 1.8% was seen without any concomitant change in lumen volume. A significant reduction in total cholesterol of 31.0% (6.1±0.8 versus 4.2±0.7 mmol/L, P <0.001) and LDL cholesterol of 42.6% (4.0±0.8 versus 2.2±0.6 mmol/L, P <0.001) was obtained. Conclusions— Lipid-lowering therapy with simvastatin for 12 months is associated with a significant P+M regression in coronary arteries measured as reduction in P+M and EEM volumes without any concomitant change in lumen volume.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jensen et al. (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: