Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This study analysed the longitudinal relationship between short sprint time and the leapfor-distance test using novel motion tracking in young soccer players. Players (n = 144, age 14.8 1.8 years) from six English Elite Player Performance Plan category three clubs completed two linear sprints (10 m, 20 m) and a leap-for-distance test (cm), on three to seven occasions across three seasons. Within-player (repeated measures) and betweenplayer (mean of the repeated measures) correlation coefficients were calculated and stratified by pre-and post-peak height velocity (PHV). Very large, negative between-player correlations were found for leap-for-distance vs. sprint time (10 m: r = -0.70, 95% CI [-0.77, -0.61]; 20 m: r = -0.77, 95% CI [-0.83, -0.70]). Correlations were large for pre-PHV (10 m: r = -0.52, 95% CI [-0.71, -0.26]; 20 m: r = -0.62, 95% CI [-0.78, -0.39]) and moderate-to-large for post-PHV (10 m: r = -0.43, 95% CI [-0.60, -0.24]; 20 m: r = -0.54, 95% CI [-0.68, -0.36], respectively). Within-player correlations were trivial-to-small for all players (10 m: r = -0.14, 95% CI [-0.24, -0.06]; 20 m: r = -0.24, 95% CI [-0.34, -0.16]) and for pre-and post-PHV subgroups (r's < -0.30). Leap-for-distance is a useful discriminator of sprint performance but should not be used for tracking intra-player sprint changes in young soccer players, irrespective of maturation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Laas et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: