Why the study?
An ECG recorded at a single time point may not detect individuals with paroxysmal AF, which is linked to distinct electro-anatomic alterations.
Does a machine learning model combining CMR radiomics and ECG features improve the discrimination of prevalent atrial fibrillation compared to ECG alone?
Does a machine learning model combining CMR radiomics and ECG features improve the discrimination of prevalent atrial fibrillation compared to ECG alone?
Combining CMR radiomics with ECG features significantly improves the detection of prevalent atrial fibrillation, especially in women where ECG alone underperforms.
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia. It is associated with a higher risk of important adverse health outcomes such as stroke and death. AF is linked to distinct electro-anatomic alterations. The main tool for AF diagnosis is the Electrocardiogram (ECG). However, an ECG recorded at a single time point may not detect individuals with paroxysmal AF. In this study, we developed machine learning models for discrimination of prevalent AF using a combination of image-derived radiomics phenotypes and ECG features. Thus, we characterize the phenotypes of prevalent AF in terms of ECG and imaging alterations. Moreover, we explore sex-differential remodelling by building sex-specific models. Our integrative model including radiomics and ECG together resulted in a better performance than ECG alone, particularly in women. ECG had a lower performance in women than men (AUC: 0.77 vs 0.88, p < 0.05) but adding radiomics features, the accuracy of the model was able to improve significantly. The sensitivity also increased considerably in women by adding the radiomics (0.68 vs 0.79, p < 0.05) having a higher detection of AF events. Our findings provide novel insights into AF-related electro-anatomic remodelling and its variations by sex. The integrative radiomics-ECG model also presents a potential novel approach for earlier detection of AF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pujadas et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: