Why the study?
This study evaluated the prospective association between living at different degrees of urbanization and altitude with five incident dyslipidemia traits.
Does living at high altitude or different degrees of urbanization affect the incidence of dyslipidemia traits in Peruvian adults?
Does living at high altitude or different degrees of urbanization affect the incidence of dyslipidemia traits in Peruvian adults?
Living at high altitude is associated with a lower incidence of high LDL-c but a higher incidence of low HDL-c compared to living at low altitude in Peruvian adults.
<ns3:p>Purpose This prospective study evaluated the association between living at different degrees of urbanization and altitude with five different incident dyslipidemia traits. Methods Using baseline (2010) and follow-up data (~2.4 years later) of Peruvian adults (aged ≥35 years) from the CRONICAS Cohort Study, the incidence of each trait was separately analyzed. Outcomes were hypercholesterolemia (≥200 mg/dL), high low-density lipoprotein cholesterol [LDL-c] (≥130 mg/dL), low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol [HDL-c] (males <40 mg/dL, females <50 mg/dL), high non-HDL-c (≥160 mg/dL), and hypertriglyceridemia (≥150 mg/dL). Urbanization (highly-urban, urban, semi-urban, rural) and altitude (low- and high-altitude) were the exposures. Results The incidence of hypertriglyceridemia, hypercholesterolemia, high LDL-c, high non-HDL-c, and low HDL-c was 22.0 (95% CI 19.6-24.5), 20.1 (95% CI 17.7-22.5), 15.3 (95% CI 13.2-17.3), 13.0 (95% CI 11.9-15.9) and 11.1 (95% CI 9.6-14.2) cases per 100 person-years, respectively. Compared to lowlanders, the incidence of low HDL-c among highlanders was over three folds higher (incidence rate ratio [IRR] 3.22; 95% CI 2.00-5.20) and that of high LDL-c was lower (IRR 0.65; 95% CI 0.45 – 0.94). Urbanization was not significantly associated with dyslipidemia. Conclusion Individuals living at high-altitude showed better LDL-c, but worse HDL-c profile expressed as lower incidence of high LDL-c and higher incidence of low HDL-c, respectively.</ns3:p>
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mendoza‐Quispe et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: