Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Retrospective study evaluates initial therapy outcomes in Mycobacterium avium complex pulmonary disease patients, indicating potential effectiveness and safety.
Introduction The global incidence of Mycobacterium avium complex pulmonary disease (MAC-PD) has been increasing, particularly in Japan. Although current guidelines recommend adding intravenous amikacin (AMK-IV) for cavitary or severe disease, evidence supporting its use as initial therapy remains limited, especially among elderly patients. Methods This retrospective study included patients with cavitary MAC-PD who received an AMK-IV-containing regimen as initial therapy at Kurashiki Central Hospital between September 2021 and July 2024. AMK-IV dosing was adjusted based on therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). The primary outcome was sputum culture conversion. Secondary outcomes included radiologic improvement, adverse events, recurrence, and all-cause mortality. Clinical characteristics and outcomes were compared between patients aged ≥75 and < 75 years. Results Twenty-one patients were analyzed (aged ≥75 years, n = 11; aged <75 years, n = 10; median age, 75 years; 76.2% female). TDM-guided dose adjustment of AMK-IV was performed in all patients, and outpatient treatment was continued using the adjusted dose. Target peak concentrations were achieved in 57.1% of patients, while target trough concentrations were achieved in all patients. At 6/12 months, sputum culture conversion was achieved in 56.3%/62.5% and radiologic improvement was observed in 83.3%/88.9%. No significant differences in sputum culture conversion or radiologic improvement were found between age groups. Treatment discontinuation occurred in two patients (9.5%), whereas 90.9% of elderly patients completed ≥3 months of AMK-IV. Conclusion AMK-IV added to a standard regimen for cavitary MAC-PD may be effective and safe. In this TDM-guided protocol, favorable outcomes were observed despite lower peak concentrations than those generally recommended.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Teramoto et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: