Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Investigates fatigue performance in dental implants, suggesting surface modifications enhance durability.
Dental implants are subjected to long‑term cyclic occlusal loading, under which fatigue failure remains a primary reliability concern. This study investigates the influence of microstructural refinement, surface condition, and implant–support boundary conditions on the fatigue performance of commercially pure titanium Grade 2. Caliber‑rolled ultrafine‑grained Grade 2 titanium was fabricated to enhance mechanical resistance and subsequently treated with SLA and SLActive surface modifications. Fatigue behavior was evaluated under ISO 14801‑compliant loading and compared with non‑rolled Grade 2 titanium, and untreated Grade 2 titanium. The results demonstrate that caliber‑rolled Grade 2 titanium with surface modification exhibits approximately twice the fatigue life of untreated Grade 2 titanium, reducing the fatigue performance gap between Grade 2 and Grade 5 to nearly half of its original magnitude. In addition, specimens tested under a tight‑holder condition, representing simulated osseointegration, showed a marked increase in static and fatigue resistance, highlighting the critical role of implant–support interaction in fatigue performance. These findings confirm that fatigue life is governed by a coupled material–surface–system response and demonstrate the effectiveness of microstructural refinement and tailored surface modification in controlling fatigue failure of dental implant systems.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Atefeh et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: