Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Evaluates motorcycle stability across multiple phenomena, indicating robust comparative assessments.
Motorcycle stability encompasses multiple physical phenomena, including straight-running divergence, cornering feasibility, oscillatory modes, and sensitivity to external disturbances. While these phenomena have been extensively studied in isolation, the absence of a transparent integration approach limits comparative assessment across vehicle configurations and operating conditions. This paper presents a structured Motorcycle Stability Index (MSI) that decomposes stability into five physically distinct and non-overlapping sub-indices, each representing a single stability phenomenon: straight-running non-oscillatory stability, steady-state cornering feasibility, high-frequency wobble stability, low-frequency weave stability, and crosswind response sensitivity. Each sub-index is evaluated using a formulation appropriate to its underlying physics, including eigenvalue analysis of the full linearized multibody model, quasi-static equilibrium analysis, and time-domain forced-response simulation, and is mapped to a bounded, dimensionless measure that preserves physical ordering while avoiding double counting by evaluation definition. The sub-indices are combined using a deliberately linear aggregation to maintain transparency and traceability rather than optimization or prediction. Application to representative motorcycle classes demonstrates physically consistent comparative trade-offs across stability phenomena, while robustness analysis confirms that relative rankings remain stable under moderate perturbations of sub-index weighting. Uncertainty is treated explicitly for forced-response behavior and propagated during integration. The proposed index is intended as a decision-support tool for comparative stability assessment within a declared linearized scope and passive rider assumption, providing relative stability indicators rather than direct prediction of real-world vehicle behavior, and complementing rather than replacing established multibody stability analyses. By explicitly separating stability phenomena and defining bounded evaluation measures, the proposed approach provides a transparent basis for engineering trade-off analysis in motorcycle development.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Modi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: