Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Demonstrates a novel identity framework in AI agents, suggesting high reliability and legal enforceability.
As AI agents evolve into autonomous economic actors, verifiable and legally binding identity frameworks become critical. This paper presents Ricardian-TEA , a novel architecture combining Triple-Entry Accounting (TEA), Ricardian Contracts, and Distributed Ledger Technology to assign “Legal-Technical Identities” to AI agents. We provide rigorous mathematical foundations: a Ricardian-TEA Integrity Theorem proving that constraint enforcement, non-disputability, and identity binding hold with overwhelming probability under standard cryptographic assumptions, and a Cyber-Chama Convergence Proposition characterising reputation-based trust dynamics. The framework ensures GDPR compliance via Zero-Knowledge Architecture and Crypto-Shredding. Proof-of-concept implementations on Ethereum Sepolia and Bitcoin SV testnets demonstrate chain-agnostic applicability, achieving at worst 1.4 s latency per transaction while maintaining 100% auditability of AI transactions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sgantzos et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: