Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
INTRODUCTION: Routine electronic health records (HER)/administrative data could enable time- and cost-efficient, real-time surveillance and health-economic evaluation of hepatobiliary postoperative complications, yet no validated algorithm currently exists. We aimed to develop and externally validate an interpretable procedure-code-based, internationally portable algorithm classifying 30-day complications by Clavien-Dindo (CDC) grades and to compare its performance to machine learning (ML) approaches. METHOD: A retrospective cohort study was conducted across two French tertiary hepatobiliary centers (Cochin for development; Beaujon for validation) from 2021-2023. Gold-standard CDC grades (≤II, III-IV, V) were assigned by an independent hepatobiliary surgeon blinded to algorithmic rules. The algorithm was expert-derived using 311 procedure codes mapped to 168 WHO's International Classification codes (ICHI), applying a temporal rule to ICU-related codes (≥POD4 for CDC-IV). ML comparators included RandomForest, ElasticNet and XGBoost trained using repeated cross-validation with hyperparameter tuning. Primary outcome was agreement with the gold-standard CDC classification; metrics included macro-F1-score, macro-balanced accuracy (MBA), sensitivity/specificity, weighted-kappa, and Ranked Probability Score (RPS) with 2000-bootstrap 95%CIs. RESULTS: Among 959 liver resections (development: 476; validation: 488), major complications occurred in 18%, with 2.6% mortality. In validation, the expert algorithm achieved macro-F1-score: 0.962 (0.946-0.977), MBA: 0.974 (0.963-0.985), sensitivity: 0.950 (0.901-0.988), specificity 0.971 (0.951-0.985), weighted-κ: 0.928 (0.900-0.962) and RPS 0.016 (0.009-0.025). ML pipelines underperformed in all metrics. Misclassification (3.2%) was mainly due to ICU timing or incomplete coding. CONCLUSION: An interpretable therapeutic-act-based algorithm accurately reproduced CDC grading from routine data and outperformed ML approaches. ICHI mapping supports international portability for real-time complication surveillance, quality benchmarking and policy evaluation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tzedakis et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: