PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 30, 20260 citationsOpen Access

A Bibliometric Evaluation and Critical Review of Machine Learning Applications in Construction Risk Prediction

View Full Paper
TNT.L NKOSISCS. H. P. Chikafalimani

Key Points

  • This research aims to synthesize the applications of machine learning in predicting construction risks and identify gaps in the current literature.
  • Bibliographic data were collected from Scopus using specified keywords.
  • VOSviewer and Bibliometrix were utilized for keyword co-occurrence and thematic analyses.
  • The analysis was interpreted through a socio-technical systems perspective.
  • Four major research clusters identified: safety management, predictive modelling, digital technologies, and deep learning at the site level.
  • Key gaps include limited understanding of how ML outputs inform safety decisions and a lack of focus on worker-centred factors.
  • A conceptual framework linking data, models, and organizational use was proposed.

Abstract

Abstract This study synthesises applications of machine learning (ML) in construction risk prediction to clarify how current research supports intelligent injury prevention. It examines how ML has been used to predict construction risk, the main methodological and thematic patterns in the literature, and the gaps that limit its contribution to proactive safety management. Bibliographic data were retrieved from Scopus using the keywords “machine learning,” “construction risk,” and “construction safety.” VOSviewer and Bibliometrix were used for keyword co-occurrence, co-authorship, and thematic analyses, interpreted through a socio-technical systems perspective. The findings reveal four dominant research clusters: safety management, predictive modelling, digital technologies, and site-level deep learning. Research is led mainly by the US and China, with notable contributions from the UK, Canada, South Korea, and Hong Kong. The synthesis identifies three key gaps: limited theorisation of how ML outputs inform safety decisions, insufficient attention to worker-centred and organisational factors in model design, and fragmented treatment of data governance and ethical risks. The study proposes a conceptual framework linking data, models, and organisational use.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

NKOSI et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1a80270307b78509432341https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20425466
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Machine learning algorithms for safer construction sites: Critical review2024 · 13 citations
  2. 2Improving Safety through Leveraging Machine Learning and Safety-Related Data in the Construction Industry2024 · 4 citations
  3. 3Machine Learning Applications in Sustainable Construction Materials: A Scientometrics Review of Global Trends, Themes, and Future Directions2025
  4. 4Advancements in Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning for Occupational Risk Prevention: A Systematic Review on Predictive Risk Modeling and Prevention Strategies2025 · 10 citations
  5. 5Mapping AI-driven construction risk and safety: a bibliometric analysis (2000–2025)2026